USPTO’s fast-track patent examination: Does the potential for earlier patent issuance justify the cost?

The new, expedited process can cut patent wait times from more than three years to just a few months

When a company successfully secures an issued patent from the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) on an important discovery, technological advancement or other new and useful invention, it can boost the company’s valuation or reputation in the marketplace. For example, a patent issuance can favorably position the company for transactions with investors, or a purchaser, by demonstrating strength in the company’s intellectual property position and the ability to prevent competitors from entering or effectively competing in the company’s market. Issued patents can also serve as market differentiators to existing or potential customers who perceive value in the patented technology or otherwise create a buzz about the company in an industry. Bearing this in mind, it is generally better from the company’s perspective for its patent applications to issue as patents sooner rather than later. But what is the cost of seeking expedited issuance of a patent and what are the potential benefits?

Companies generally understand that they need to file patent applications on their inventions quickly in order to protect their rights. Currently, however, the applicant has a choice as to how quickly the USPTO examines each patent application, and the applicant’s decision in that regard is not as clear. Last year, the agency enacted a Track I Prioritized Examination Program as part of the America Invents Act. Under the program, the USPTO aims to complete its examination of a patent application within roughly a year or less, and sometimes as quickly as a few months. Thus, so long as the subject matter of the patent application is new and nonobvious from the prior art and meets other threshold requirements for patent eligibility, the agency should issue a patent within a year or less. In contrast, traditional or normal-track examination typically takes more than three years.

Given the choice, when should a company request to participate in the Track I program? One consideration is cost. The trade-off for a faster examination under the program is that the USPTO’s fee is about 300 percent higher than the cost of a normal-track examination. For smaller companies with less than 500 employees, the fee increases from about $830 to roughly $3,230 to participate in the Track I program. For larger companies, the cost rises from about $1,550 to about $6,350. In addition, the USPTO’s faster examination of the patent application means that companies will likely incur legal fees for responding to communications from the agency earlier in time (within one year of filing the patent application instead of more than three years later).

Notwithstanding the added cost, there are situations in which filing a patent application under the Track I program may be justified. For example, a company might consider filing under the program when the subject matter of the patent application covers aspects of the company’s current products or near-term, future product offerings. The company could potentially benefit from an ability to mark or otherwise identify those products as patented.

Companies can also convert existing patent applications, originally filed under the USPTO’s normal-track program, into Track I applications. Thus, a company might also wish to use the Track I program if it learns, after initially filing a patent application under the normal-track program, that the subject matter of the patent application covers aspects of a competitor’s product. If the company secures the patent, it can seek damages for patent infringement and potentially an injunction that would prevent its competitor from selling the infringing product in the future.

Another consideration is inventor satisfaction. Companies often incentivize their employees to invent on the company’s behalf. But the USPTO’s normal-track examination is often a “hurry up and wait” proposition. Under that process, an inventor’s “eureka” moment and the preparation and filing of a patent application is followed by virtual silence from the USPTO for more than three years.  In contrast, under the Track I program, an inventor may remain more committed to the process because the USPTO will provide a much faster determination on patentability. Satisfied inventors can lead to more inventions. A faster examination also can help to ensure that the inventor is still present at the company or otherwise available to assist if the agency initially rejects the application.

The USPTO’s Track I Prioritized Examination Program is deserving of serious, but careful, consideration. Notwithstanding its additional cost, examination under the Track I program has its benefits.

About the Author
Peter Snell

Peter Snell

Peter Snell is a Member in the Intellectual Property Section of Mintz Levin's New York office. Peter litigates patent infringement, patent invalidity and other intellectual property disputes in courts all across the country, including U.S. district courts and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.


Glad you liked it. Would you like to share?

Sharing this page …

Thanks! Close

Add New Comment

  • Image
Real-time updating is paused. (Resume)

Showing 0 comments

The 13th Annual SuperConference

When: May 6-8, 2013

Where: Chicago, IL

Featuring expert insights from across the legal industry, including top general counsel, leading law firms, government and regulatory leaders, and thought-provoking keynote speakers, SuperConference is the most exclusive conference for senior corporate counsel.

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library

Steps You Can Take to Mitigate the Risks of Trade...

No company is immune to trade secret theft. Download this whitepaper, “Trade Secret Theft—Managing the...

Select the Right Vendor for Your Archiving Needs

Proofpoint is one of just three vendors positioned as leaders in the new report, which...

Complimentary Whitepaper: 2013 Economic Outlook

Find out what economists anticipate for 2013 and how higher payroll taxes and federal spending...

Reducing Costs with Advanced Review Strategies – Prioritization for 100%...

Legal departments are struggling for ways to reduce, or at least stop growth in their...

Complimentary Report: Cloud Storage, IT Security and Compliance Issues

Is your organization poised to face the compliance challenges that arise from data storage solutions?...

Steps You Can Take to Mitigate the Risks of Trade...

No company is immune to trade secret theft. Download this whitepaper, “Trade Secret Theft—Managing the...

Select the Right Vendor for Your Archiving Needs

Proofpoint is one of just three vendors positioned as leaders in the new report, which...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.